Explained : Who is TMC’s Firhad Hakim and why is he in spotlight for ‘chocolate politics’ ahead of West Bengal elections 2026? Know REAL reason here and Its Impact

The political battle in Bhabanipur, one of West Bengal’s most high-profile constituencies, has taken an unusual turn, reaching even chocolates. Senior minister and former Kolkata Mayor Firhad Hakim was seen campaigning door-to-door in the Chetla area, seeking votes for Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. During the campaign, a video captured a moment that has now stirred political debate. Hakim was seen taking chocolates out of his pocket and distributing them to children present at a house. The opposition has called this an attempt to influence voters and is preparing to file a complaint with the Election Commission of India. The key question is whether this seemingly harmless act violates the Model Code of Conduct.

Rising Political Profile of Firhad Hakim

In recent years, Firhad Hakim’s stature in West Bengal politics has grown significantly. He is considered one of Mamata Banerjee’s most trusted aides and a prominent minority face of the party. From serving as Kolkata Mayor to holding the Urban Development portfolio, his political journey reflects his influence.

He was also in the news last year due to a controversial statement about community representation. Now, he is again making headlines, this time over the “chocolate distribution” incident during campaigning in Bhabanipur.

What Do Election Rules Say?

According to election guidelines, distributing any kind of goods, gifts, or food items during campaigning, even to children, can be seen as a violation of the Model Code of Conduct.

• Inducement of voters: Under the “General Conduct” rules, candidates or their agents cannot offer any form of inducement to voters. Even though chocolates were given to children, it may still be interpreted as an attempt to influence voters.
• Use of children: In February 2024, the Election Commission introduced a “zero tolerance” policy stating that children should not be used in political campaigns. While children were not campaigning here, giving them gifts could still be viewed as questionable.

Possible Legal Provisions

• Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: Treats bribery, including gifts meant to influence voters, as a corrupt practice.
• Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023: Provisions related to undue influence in elections could also apply.

Will the Election Commission Take Action?

Usually, distributing small items like chocolates or toffees may be ignored on humanitarian grounds. However, if opposition parties like BJP, Congress, or CPI(M) present it as an attempt to “buy votes” with evidence, the Election Commission may issue a show-cause notice to Firhad Hakim.

The ruling party’s stand is that it was simply a gesture of affection towards children and had no political intent. However, given the sensitivity of the Bhabanipur seat, officials are closely monitoring the situation and reviewing the video.

Now, it remains to be seen whether the Election Commission treats this as a minor incident or a serious violation of the Model Code of Conduct.