Minister rejects Corbyn’s plea for meeting over Palestine Action hunger strikers – UK politics live | Politics
Minister rejects plea from Jeremy Corbyn for meeting about concerns of health of Palestine Action hunger strikers
A Home Office minister has refused a request from Jeremy Corbyn for a meeting to discuss the plight of eight remand prisoners accused of offences related to Palestine Action who are on hunger strike.
Corbyn raised the issued during justice questions when he said there were “deep concerns” about the group, five of whom have already been taken to hospital.
The group have various demands, including immediate bail and the lifting the ban on Palestine Action. The first activists started their hunger strike in October.
Corbyn asked:
There are a number of prisoners at the present time who are undertaking a hunger strike. They are remand prisoner and some of them don’t have a trial date until 2027.
There are deep concerns expressed by them, their families and their legal representatives about access to medical treatment and the way they have been treated when taken to hospital as well.
To help the situation, would the minister be able to meet their legal representatives, and families if necessary, in order to discuss the situation and try and move forward to help the safety of these particular prisoners?
Jake Richards, a Home Office minister, replied:
No.
Luckily, the Ministry of Justice and the Prison Service has robust and proper guidance and procedures for when these scenarios come to fruition.
I am satisfied, and the ministry is satisfied, that those procedures are being enacted, and we will continue to keep it under review.
Around the same time Corbyn released a letter on social media, signed by more than 50 MPs and peers, also calling for a ministerial meeting with laywers representing the eight remand prisoners. He said:
More than 50 MPs and Peers have joined me in urging David Lammy to immediately meet with the lawyers of those on hunger strike.
The government needs to wake up, take responsibility, and show some humanity before it is too late
Two of the eight have been on hunger strike for 45 days, and their relatives have warned they could die if the matter is not resolved.
Key events
Yvette Cooper rejects Trump administration’s claim Europe at risk of ‘civilisational erasure’ becaue of migration
Yvette Cooper, the foreign secretary, has rejected the Trump administration’s claim that Europe faces “civilisational erasure” because of issues like migration and ethnic diversity.
While she did not criticise the president in personal terms, in evidence to the Commons foreign affairs committee she firmly dismissed one of the central ideas in his administration’s new national security strategy.
The document says that “economic decline [in Europe] is eclipsed by the real and more stark prospect of civilisational erasure” and that migration is one of the main reasons for this. It says: “Should present trends continue, the continent will be unrecognisable in 20 years or less.”
Cooper told the committee that, while the government agreed with some aspects of the strategy (which also calls for higher European defence spending), there were other areas where the UK took a different view.
She went on:
I think [it] wouldn’t surprise you that we’d take a different view on the strength of European democracies, the strength of our freedoms, our support for communities and our social cohesion as well.
And I think if you want to talk about the centuries of civilisation that we have to be proud of, our cultural industries are stronger than they have ever been. It’s a more important part of our economy than it has ever been.
We have strong and diverse communities who are proud to be British, who are an incredibly important part of the kind of country that we are, and we celebrate that, and will continue to do so.
Cooper said it was possible for the UK and the US to have “robust differences” on some topics. And she dismissed that parties had to share Trump’s ideas to be patriotic.
I would also just say I regard my party as a patriotic party as well, and will continue to be very clear about the strength of our country.
I’m very proud of Britain and the diverse country that we are, the creative, dynamic country that we are, and also the strong ally that we are to all sorts of countries across the world.
Cooper was more critical of the Trump document than her junior ministerial colleague, Seema Malhotra, who answered an urgent question about it in the Commons last week.
During that UQ, the former Labour minister Liam Byrne said the document had echoes of “some extreme rightwing tropes that date back to the 1930s”. In a post at the time I described this as a reference to the Nazis, but Byrne subsequently got in touch to say he was not referring to the Nazis but to Oswald Spengler, a German philosopher who wrote The Decline of the West in the 1920s and whose ideas influenced the ‘great replacement theory’ popular with the far right today. Byrne has explained this in more detail in a post on his Radical Centre Substack.
Minister rejects plea from Jeremy Corbyn for meeting about concerns of health of Palestine Action hunger strikers
A Home Office minister has refused a request from Jeremy Corbyn for a meeting to discuss the plight of eight remand prisoners accused of offences related to Palestine Action who are on hunger strike.
Corbyn raised the issued during justice questions when he said there were “deep concerns” about the group, five of whom have already been taken to hospital.
The group have various demands, including immediate bail and the lifting the ban on Palestine Action. The first activists started their hunger strike in October.
Corbyn asked:
There are a number of prisoners at the present time who are undertaking a hunger strike. They are remand prisoner and some of them don’t have a trial date until 2027.
There are deep concerns expressed by them, their families and their legal representatives about access to medical treatment and the way they have been treated when taken to hospital as well.
To help the situation, would the minister be able to meet their legal representatives, and families if necessary, in order to discuss the situation and try and move forward to help the safety of these particular prisoners?
Jake Richards, a Home Office minister, replied:
No.
Luckily, the Ministry of Justice and the Prison Service has robust and proper guidance and procedures for when these scenarios come to fruition.
I am satisfied, and the ministry is satisfied, that those procedures are being enacted, and we will continue to keep it under review.
Around the same time Corbyn released a letter on social media, signed by more than 50 MPs and peers, also calling for a ministerial meeting with laywers representing the eight remand prisoners. He said:
More than 50 MPs and Peers have joined me in urging David Lammy to immediately meet with the lawyers of those on hunger strike.
The government needs to wake up, take responsibility, and show some humanity before it is too late
Two of the eight have been on hunger strike for 45 days, and their relatives have warned they could die if the matter is not resolved.
A reader asks:
@ Andrew. Can we make any link between the BBC case and the US pausing the 41bn of tech investments?
Not really, other than that they are both evidence of Donald Trump being capricious.
BBC vows to defend itself in $10bn Donald Trump lawsuit
The BBC has vowed to defend itself against the $10bn lawsuit that the US president, Donald Trump filed against it, Eleni Courea and Jamie Grierson report.
Jim Dickson (Lab) says that Gwain Towler, the former Ukip, Brexit party and Reform UK press officer, is on record as saying that he asked Nathan Gill why he was making pro-Russian statements in the European parliament, but accepted Gill’s claim it was a free speech issue. He says this sort of approach is not good enough.
Dickson is referring to a post that Towler wrote on his Substack blog.
I remember vividly when Nathan first started raising questions about Ukraine in the European Parliament. This was around 2018, as tensions simmered between Kyiv and Moscow. In my role as UKIP’s comms chief, I gave him a proper rollicking, our party’s focus was Brexit and the UK, not meddling in Eastern European geopolitics. It was completely outside our purview, a distraction that could dilute our message and alienate supporters.
But Nathan countered smoothly, framing it as a matter of freedom of speech, defending the right to question narratives about press freedom and political persecution in Ukraine. He argued passionately that MEPs should speak freely without fear of censorship. I accepted his explanation at face value; after all, we were the party of free expression, weren’t we? It seemed principled, even bold. Little did I know, those “questions” were the opening salvos in a far more sinister agenda.
Here is the news release from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government about the inquiry into foreign financial interference in UK politics.
Reed confirms that crypto currency will be in scope for this review.
Paul Waugh (Lab) returned to Nathan Gill, and said there were at least eight MEPs, either in the Brexit party or Ukip, were approached by Gill and asked to make pro-Russia statement. He went on:
What is it about parties led by [Nigel Farage] that makes them uniquely susceptible to foreign bribes?
Reed said he would not comment on specific allegations. He said this review is about protecting democracy in the round.
Stephen Gethins (SNP) asks if the EU referendum will be in scope for this inquiry.
Reed says the government is “not seeking to relitigate the past”, and he says there is no evidence that foreign interference has affected the results of elections in the past.
Chris Law (SNP) asks if any law changes might place before May, when the local, Scottish and Welsh elections are taking place.
Reed says he cannot anticipate the review will find.
Richard Tice, the Reform UK deputy leader, says that while Reed claims to be championing democracy now, he recently cancelled some local elections. He says that Reform of course welcomes the review. But he demands an assurance that it will also cover Chinese influence over Labour. He refers to Barry Gardiner taking money from a Chinese lawyer who was subsequently identified as a Chinese government agent.
Reed says the inquiry will look at all potential sources of malign, foreign interference.
He says, if any failings are identified, party leaders should put the national interest first.
Rosie Wrighting says a former Brexit party MEP who made similar comments to Nathan Gill refused to answer questions from the BBC about possible bribes. She asks for an assurance this will be looked at.
Reed says no stone will be left unturned.
Calum Miller (Lib Dem) follows, and he makes the same point. He says there is evidence that other MEPs were targeted for bribes. He asks for an assurance that the review will be able to go back and look at past cases.
Reed does not give that assurance. He says the purpose of the review is not to relitigate past cases and it will be forward looking.
Reed says review into foreign financial interference into UK politics will not look into individual cases
Sean Woodcock (Lab) said Richard Tice, the Reform UK deputy leader, recently accepted hospitality from Lubov Chernukhin, a Conservative donor and the wife of Russia’s former deputy finance minister.
Woodock asked if the review would cover accepting gifts from Russian oligarchs.
Reed said the review would not consider individual case, but instead the wider issue of foreign financial interference.
Paul Holmes, a shadow housing minister, responded to Reed for the Conservatives. He welcomed the decision to hold a review, but criticised the government for its decision to postpone some local elections.
Speaking for the Liberal Democrats, Zöe Franklin also welcomed the announcement.
But she also urged the government to go further and consider the case for a cap on the amount individuals can give to political parties. She says a small number of very rich people have too much influence over British politics.
Reed said the government was already planning to close loopholes in the legislation on foreign donations.
But he said, since the government’s strategy was published, “events have shown that we need to consider whether our firewall is enough”.
Reed said the findings of the review would influence the elections bill being introduced next year. He said:
The findings of the independent review will build on both the government’s elections strategy and counter political interference and espionage action plan, and inform the elections and democracy bill that we will bring forward next year.
Source: www.theguardian.com
Published: 2025-12-16 21:56:00
Tags:
This article was automatically curated from public sources. For full details, visit the original source link above.
