Case Explained: Proposed changes to meth laws may bring relief for low-level offenders in North Texas – Legal Perspective

Changes in how methamphetamine trafficking is punished under federal law are being proposed this year to bring sentences more in line with other hard drugs such as cocaine and heroin.

The impact of such changes, if approved, could have a profound effect on the fates of North Texas drug defendants. This region has consistently recorded the toughest meth sentences in the nation – a key finding of a 2025 Dallas Morning News investigation.

Over the past decade, meth sentences in the Northern District of Texas were often stiffer than those imposed on rapists and other violent criminals. And they are more severe than sentences for other, deadlier drugs such as fentanyl, according to the paper’s investigation, Meth: The Prison Pipeline.

Meth sentencing decisions are often based on outdated data and assumptions, not science, according to a growing consensus of professionals who study the drug’s chemistry, effects and abuse patterns.

Meth is not only the most common illegal narcotic in the U.S., it’s also the single-biggest reason why people are locked up in federal prison today, federal officials acknowledge.

The proposed meth reforms are the continuation of a growing trend in criminal justice policy, reflecting changing attitudes about drug prosecutions. Polls show that most Americans believe that lengthy prison terms, which are costly to taxpayers, should be reserved for violent and hardened repeat offenders.

Drug policies and procedures are continuing to be adjusted to changing conditions, like in November when new sentencing guidelines took effect.

Under those changes, certain low-level, nonviolent drug offenders could receive a break in sentencing. The change allows punishments to be tailored more closely to the role a defendant played in an offense. Drug couriers and lookouts, for example, are now eligible for shorter sentences. Other applicable roles include running errands and sending or receiving phone calls.

That change was made to soften the law’s overreliance on drug weight in assessing punishment in federal drug trafficking cases.

The News reported last year that some nonviolent meth offenders prosecuted in North Texas are serving decades in prison. Like Jose Milton Puentes, 44, who mailed roughly a pound of meth across state lines. Puentes, a first-time offender who cooperated with authorities and pleaded guilty, was sentenced to 30 years in prison.

For this year’s amendment cycle, the U.S. Sentencing Commission is proposing a change to the drug sentencing guidelines that would remove the current purity distinctions associated with meth, which have led to outsized prison sentences.

Unlike most illegal drugs, meth offenders are subject to differing punishment ranges based on the drug’s purity, with higher purity leading to higher sentences. Critics say those distinctions are arbitrary and unfair, being based on outdated assumptions and bad science.

When Congress was writing the drug laws in the 1980s and ‘90s, it was thought that higher purity in meth suggested greater culpability. That no longer holds true, given that almost all meth sold today in the U.S. is more than 95% pure, meaning it lacks contaminants or filler. As a result, meth offenses today come with the toughest penalties of any drug, even deadly fentanyl.

The Sentencing Commission’s proposal would align meth punishments more closely with those for heroin and cocaine. The Commission is seeking written public comment on the topic as well as other proposed amendments to the sentencing guidelines. Submissions are due by Feb. 10.

The guidelines are recommendations only, intended to help judges fashion fair sentences that are consistent with how offenders are treated in courts nationwide.

The Commission made it a priority for 2026 to enact changes to the meth sentencing guidelines based on feedback it received earlier this year from academic, medical, scientific and law enforcement experts.

Congress passes laws setting punishments for drug offenses. The Sentencing Commission is an independent agency in the judiciary that develops sentencing policies and guidelines for federal courts based on those laws.

The commissioners, who are appointed to the nine-member panel by the president and confirmed by the Senate, meet regularly to study data and trends, as well as take testimony from experts and stakeholders. They then vote on whether the sentencing guidelines need to be updated to better reflect empirical evidence and current knowledge.

“Public feedback continues to be invaluable to the Commission’s work,” said Carlton W. Reeves, its chairman, in an Aug. 6 written statement about comments received from individuals and groups.

“Their views informed our priorities and will help us as we work toward those priorities and continue to pursue policies that improve federal sentencing,” said Reeves, a federal judge in Mississippi.

Meth purity irrelevant

During an August 2025 public hearing in Washington D.C., panels of experts from a variety of fields told the commissioners the current meth sentencing guidelines don’t make sense. They said outdated and unscientific drug policies drive sentencing decisions.

Even the Drug Enforcement Administration’s chief of forensics said purity no longer matters. Scott R. Oulton, a chemist, told the commissioners that all meth today is pure.

“I don’t believe there’s any distinction left in purity that is helpful,” he said. “It’s all the same.”

Karla Wagner, a University of Nevada public health professor and co-director of the Center for Drug Use, Equity and Policy Research, said in her testimony that today’s meth contains very few adulterants.

“People are not choosing their drugs based on purity,” she said. “Most people are responding to the market, not driving it.”

Related

And users are being caught with greater amounts because today’s meth prices are so cheap, Wagner said. But under the law, such people might be viewed as traffickers, she said.

Jonathan P. Caulkins, a drug policy researcher at Carnegie Mellon University, told the commissioners that having two different punishment ranges for meth in its different forms results in “arbitrary decisions” in charging and sentencing. He said meth should be treated like cocaine and other similar drugs.

“Purity is essentially useless for methamphetamine,” Caulkins said.

Richard De La Garza, a professor in the pharmacology department at the University of Texas Medical Branch, said in his testimony that he conducts drug studies involving users. He said meth’s purity does not hold any importance to users.

“All they want to do is get that high,” he said.

They will typically only use an amount of meth that gives them the desired effect and not take more than that, De La Garza told commissioners.

Identifying blame

Panelists at the August public hearing told the Sentencing Commission that there are better ways to determine a defendant’s role in a drug organization, although some struggled to name such indicators.

Kyle Williamson, a San Antonio police sergeant, told the commissioners in his prepared statement that tough sentences are warranted for certain drug traffickers.

“Violent actions coupled with addictive levels of high-grade drugs should always be a consideration for punishment,” he said. “Any change in our laws that minimizes the consequences of actions by these monsters gives the impression that our society is willing to tolerate the abuse of our public by individuals that care not about who they hurt as long as there is a monetary gain for them.”

When asked how culpability in a drug trafficking organization should be determined, Williamson said just because someone may not look the “cartel type” doesn’t mean they’re not moving large drug amounts. At some point, drug weight has to come into play, he said. A street-level user, for example, would not have 10 pounds of meth, he said.

“It’s a difficult question,” Williamson said.

Mark Delaney, special agent in charge of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, told the commissioners it’s not easy to determine culpability among members of a meth conspiracy. Weight alone is not a good judge because even users can be found with significant amounts, said Delaney, who serves on the Tennessee Dangerous Drugs Task Force.

“You have to look at the totality of the circumstances,” Delaney said.

As reported in Meth: The Prison Pipeline, some drug policy experts have recommended that the amount of profits earned by a person can be a good marker of leadership and responsibility. So can those who set prices; deal with Mexican cartel suppliers; launder money; establish drug houses; and pay smugglers, intermediaries and others.

Another panelist was John Mendelson, a physician and chief medical officer of Ria Health and a clinical professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. He said it’s important to understand why people are using meth today.

Stimulant epidemics usually have occurred worldwide when people needed to work really hard to earn a living, he said. Which is why meth use is currently high, Mendelson added.

“To work hard, you need to stay awake. To stay awake, you need a simulant,” he said. “This is a problem of people who want to work, not people who don’t want to work.”

People tend to seek drugs for specific reasons and to suit certain financial conditions, he said. Cocaine epidemics occurred during times of wealth, Mendelson said, while meth is abused during tough economic periods.

Mendelson said truck drivers during the 1950s were taking stimulants to stay awake, and the military uses them to this day. When asked why people are taking illegal meth as opposed to legal varieties such as Adderall, he said it’s because meth is cheaper.

Mendelson said he believes the meth purity distinctions written into the law are “punitive” and “excessive” for many people who are just trying to work; to drive a truck or work three jobs. He added that tough sentences are warranted for other factors such as use of violence.

Mendelson’s recommendation for the Sentencing Commission was to obtain better education about drugs and specifically to seek advice from drug abuse experts.

He has some experience in that department, as an advisor to the popular CBS crime drama, “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation.” Mendelson said that for a decade, he helped the producers make sure the episodes were scientifically accurate.

Now, he hopes to play a role in ensuring sentences are ethically just.