Case Explained:This article breaks down the legal background, charges, and implications of Case Explained: Judge President’s dramatic intervention clarifies legal processes for murder suspects in Durban High Court – Legal Perspective
Nomonde Zondi|Published
The pre-trial conference of three men accused of murder in the Durban High Court took an unexpected turn when KwaZulu-Natal Judge President (JP) Thoba Poyo-Dlwati had to step in to explain key legal procedures in IsiZulu.
The accused, Siphamandla Vulindlela Hlongwane, Ngcebo Treasure Luthuli, and Thokozani Emmanuel Luthuli, are refusing to make Section 220 admissions, fearing that they are being tricked into pleading guilty.
Judge Poyo-Dlwati patiently clarified earlier this week that admitting that the people with particular ID numbers died does not equate to admitting guilt. She explained that these admissions save time during trial and avoid the State from calling witnesses who will testify that the victims indeed died.
This intervention came after their lawyers told Poyo-Dlwati that they had explained the admissions with no success to their clients.
“Do consider the issues of admissions,” she urged the men.
As the matter was about to be postponed, Ngcebo raised his hand to express a lack of trust in his Legal Aid lawyer, Advocate Phumelele Daniso.
Ngcebo claimed Daniso refused to follow up on his concerns about a witness statement and to investigate a possible familial link between the investigating officer and one of his alleged victims, Khanyisani Ndlovu, who shares the same surname.
Judge Poyo-Dlwati informed Ngcebo that his lawyer was correct, as those were questions to be posed during the trial.
Ngcebo also demanded a trial-within-a-trial, believing the witness statement did not connect him to the crimes, and sought a new lawyer and bail. He also revealed he had turned down an offer to become a State witness, which his lawyer had relayed.
To ensure Ngcebo fully understood the process, the Judge President explained all these complex matters in IsiZulu.
She defended Daniso, stating: “He was quite right. He did well by telling you what the prosecutor was saying, because it would be a problem if he did not tell you. At this stage, a trial-within-a-trial cannot be conducted.”
Furthermore, she clarified that bail applications are not handled in the High Court and that the police, not the court, were responsible for the decision to charge him and his co-accused.
The charges involve multiple murder counts. Ngcebo and Hlongwane face six charges, including the murder of Khanyisani Ndlovu on March 23, 2024.
The State alleges Hlongwane, who sold alcohol, suspected his neighbour and competitor, Titus Khethani Sosibo, of wanting to kill him..
When Ndlovu came to buy alcohol, Hlongwane and Ngcebo allegedly mistook him for a hitman sent by Sosibo and shot him.
Hlongwane is also facing five other solo charges, including the alleged murder of Sosibo.
Hlongwane and Thokozani face three additional charges, including robbery with aggravating circumstances and the murder of Mxolise Peaceman Zungu.
Thokozani faces four additional charges, including unlawful possession of prohibited firearms. The State alleges the same firearms were used in the murders of Ndlovu, Sosibo, and Zungu.
The trial is scheduled to begin on January 18, 2027.
[email protected]